Influence of Asphalt-Binder Content on The Hydraulic and Mechanical Performance of A Permeable Friction Course Using Multi-Criteria Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2026.30.5.137 Full articleAbstract
Most construction standards specify the asphalt-binder content for Permeable Friction Course (PFC) mix based on functional parameters, such as air voids (AV), and durability (Cantabro Loss CL). However, these standards do not account for parameters that assess the mixture's mechanical behavior. This study integrated the evaluation of mechanical and hydraulic performance, along with a multi-criteria analysis using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), of a PFC mixture in the laboratory, testing asphalt contents of 4.5%, 5.0%, and 5.5%, modified with crumb rubber (CRM) (percentage of the total mixture mass). Hydraulic properties (AV and permeability coefficient), durability (CL at 25°C and 60°C), and mechanical characteristics were evaluated through indirect tensile strength (ITS), Resilient Modulus (RM), tensile strength ratio (TSR), and static creep test. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine whether differences in results were significant. Additionally, AHP was employed to identify the optimal asphalt content based on laboratory test outcomes. The findings suggest that, following traditional construction standards in Colombia, the asphalt-binder content for the PFC mix should be 5.0%. Nevertheless, the multi criteria analysis based on the proposed methodology indicates that an asphalt-binder content of 5.5% provides better performance. Although this increase entails higher costs, it considerably improves the pavement's durability.
Keywords:
Permeable Friction Course, Air Voids, Permeability, Mechanical behavior, Multi criteriaAffiliations
- Military University Nueva Granada
- Military University Nueva Granada
- Military University Nueva Granada
Corresponding author: Juan Gabriel Bastidas-Martínez, juan.bastidas@unimilitar.edu.co
Downloads
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Engineering Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Engineering Journal agree to transfer all copyright rights in and to the above work to the Engineering Journal (EJ)'s Editorial Board so that EJ's Editorial Board shall have the right to publish the work for nonprofit use in any media or form. In return, authors retain: (1) all proprietary rights other than copyright; (2) re-use of all or part of the above paper in their other work; (3) right to reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above paper for authors' personal use or for company use if the source and EJ's copyright notice is indicated, and if the reproduction is not made for the purpose of sale.